Just for interest, you are also wrong about my claim regarding how you live in fantasy land ... which BTW was originally your own suggestion, not mine. I simply pointed out my view of what you thought about the flaming sword.
------------
You said - He thinks theflaming sword is for decoration and "keeping"the way ... something like street lamp.
You then said - Clearly understood by everyoneelse but all wrong according to the word of wotsup because wotsup has foundother meanings and so only this other meaning is allowed.
I said - Cut the bull, you pretty much claimed --> I was in fantasy land thinking the Gen verse said, means, " to keep the way of the tree of life".
Now anyone with half a brain can see, what you claimed wotsupthought, is EXACTLY what these words here are saying = to keep the way.
You then tried to avoid your false claim, error by notaddressing it.
So yes you are correct, it was me that actually introduced the "fantasy" word, but from what I'm seeing here, "fantasy as in "pretty much", is a fair and reasonable word to used in light of your sarcastic remarks here.
But as I said, suggested, you are correct in that it was me that introduced a word to sum up your remarks, or should I add, how they appeared to come across.
But at the end of the day, you know how you intended them, so I suppose that's all that really matters, so I will leave your own thoughts, intentions with you.
----------------
Now as for the other matters you bring up.
The Luke event your covering, if at all, you will not find I have discussed that area to any great lengths, etc etc.
The Luke event you quoted is from what I say is the second prophesy which include a long list of things, of which I say is not part of the limited events in "the some standing here" area.
The latter here, I have discussed at great lengths, but not the area you quoted.
Now you have pulled a post from way back it would seem, however, due to numerous on going house matters, not to mention trying to paint the sons house, I haven't the time, neither can I be bothered back tracking the posts etc, to give a fair and reasonable reply.
It would also appear, to some degree I have misread your post, in thinking you were linking your reference to the area, "some standing here".
I would have to back track to where this started, so see if I cocked up (lol), but I haven't got time, plus I don't think it's worth it.
So here is what I propose, from the surface of it, YOU got me, shame on my part.
We will say I had unfounded grounds to say your were wrong and you had enough information to make your claim.
So lets just say I'm soz
PS. Thanks for just spitting out what was on your chest and what we might say, to my face and not about me, but to me.
