Butcherboy, you said:
It clearly shows solar irradiance has dropped in the last few years, completely undermining the sceptic and denialist arguments.
Actually the denialists, as well as the sceptics argument is that in the last 10 years the temperature is dropping. The Sunspot activity completely supports that!
Plus it is an 11 year cycle and does not explain the longer term warming trend.
Who says it does? Unlike the alarmists, the denialists do not have a 'tunnel' vision focused on one factor only (CO2). There are a lot of factors working together - ALL ignored by the IPCC scientists, focused only on CO2.
Above I mentioned one of them: Milankovich Cycles. They give better long term understanding of the climate. No one, unfortunately, bothers to spend money on computer modelling them, as that will not bring ETS money, just better understanding on what to expect!
- Forums
- General
- do natural processes explain the warming? 'no'
do natural processes explain the warming? 'no', page-20
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online