doctor ordered to keep silent ..., page-2

I am not too sure whether this is good or bad news, to be honest.

but I am suspecting a little bit of foul play here; like why would a doctor claiming he has a part on something and say it is not a good test. Surely if it is not a valid test, you wouldn't want to claim any part of it? :P

I don't know, too hard to read from this news.