Does anyone actually still think 'the Voice' unifying?, page-117

  1. 20,847 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1222
    If the Voice is going to solve the indigenous issues why does it have to be permanently in the constitution?
    By default having it as a permanent body says it will never solve indigenous issues otherwise when it solved Indigenous issues it would be there permanently with no purpose.

    This whole Voice proposal has been a complete mess from the start.
    All the major issues facing indigenous people are the responsibility of the States & Teritories not the Federal government (education, health, crime, housing).
    Any Voice should therefore be at a State or Territory level to actually make a difference.

    SA has already past legislation for a SA Voice, why not wait to see whether that actually has any positive outcomes in 5 years time before any other Voice bodies are set-up?
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.