That cctrouble user was posting on another Aussie stock forum as well and I got the feeling that he probably was someone with a debt that CreditCorp was trying to collect.
I will say that I object to the moderator erasing my original post, which DID NOT IN ANY WAY support the information I was linking. It's absolutely legitimate to post a link to a website with unproven allegations and to then ask others if this is a problem or not. That website includes a PDF scan of a letter from an official government entity, and that's a level of documentation that should at least be openly discussed, even if to dismiss it as unimportant.
The substance in this thread could have been simply to counter those allegations. Unfortunately, by editing out the original link, the moderator disallows the possibility of anyone presenting a legitimate counter argument to the points made. How did such censorship serve the interests of our investing community? I didn't believe that the issues raised on that website were fatal, and I simply wanted coherent arguments against the points and evidence presented. I'm just confused the censorship of the link....
CCP Price at posting:
$2.02 Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)