Does Dragon have a right to start mining in Kaapelinkulma any time?

Dragon informs in recent report 22.12.2017, that they could start mining
in Kaapelinkulma because they have all permits and agreements in place.
“Mining at Kaapelinkulma is planned to commence at the cessation of mining high-grade ore from Orivesi, but as the Company has all Permits and agreements in place, it can commence mining at any stage.”
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/an...sults-from-southern-finalnd-projects.3927896/ See 3 rd page.

However, they could not start the mining e.g. because they lack
at least a decision of TUKES -guarantees. This is possibly formally not a permit or
an agreement, but anyway the information given is false.
http://tukes.fi/Tiedostot/nettikuulutuskaapelinkulma.pdf
See page 3/6 beginning:
“Lupamääräykset tarkitetaan ennen varsinaisen kaivostoiminnan aloittamista, kuitenkin viimeistään 1.6.2019.”
“Permit orders will be revised before starting actual mining, however latest 1.6.2019.”
The appealable TUKES-decission should appear here
http://tukes.fi/fi/Toimialat/Kaivok...atokset/Paatokset-yleiset-ja-yksityiset-edut/

I would also like to note, that the decission of permit authority not to amend or cancel the
environmental permit of Kaapelinkulma has been appealed to Vaasa administrative court.
This would increase the risks of starting as Dragon has not had any success in Vaasa recently.
Dragon has not published the information about the appeal some 3 weeks ago.

Furthermore there is the butterfly-issue and police investigation about which information
has been limited in ASX except legal analysis for Hong Kong.
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/police-investigation-and-social-license-of-kaapelinkulma.3754653/
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/dead-butterfly-effect-will-take-down-dragon-mining.3772245/