does it need to be called marriage, page-45

I've refrained from getting involved in these threads on 'gay marriage' until now but when people start quoting the bible and demanding that we in the 21st century should be adhering to a literal interpretation I feel bound to point out the stupidity of it.

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.

10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Prawns are an abomination. Oysters, too. Rate the same on the naughty meter as gay sex, doncha know. Abomination.

Nonsense.