Vendor,
I agree with what your saying and am totally against the word "Marriage" to be included for gay couples. The idea of "equality" as an argument is ludicrous to say the least.
Firstly, if equality is really what the issue is about, why is there a differentiation between the sexualities in the first place? Ex: Hetrosexual - Homosexual - Bisexual
Isn't identifying a persons sexuality showing that we are not equal. We all have different preferences and there is a need to identify those preferences. I would assume the Gay community would have to agree with that, otherwise they wouldn't have a Mandate to stand on in the first place.
Then why are they so inherent on stealing the word "Marriage" from our vocabulary to include Gay Couples when it was never intended for that purpose? It was intended for hetrosexuals. By all means,i don't have a problemwith Gay couples having exactly the same rights as Hetro couples.
I wouldn't have a problem if Gays had a word identifying thier own union as suggested by vendor as long as it does not incude the word "Marriage".
It is not and never will be.
IMHO.
Cheers markco2
.
- Forums
- General
- does it need to be called marriage
does it need to be called marriage, page-5
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
VMM
VIRIDIS MINING AND MINERALS LIMITED
Rafael Moreno, CEO
Rafael Moreno
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online