Agreed but to borrow an others terms I think you should be concerned when the
management team has been "given
me multiple chances to take profit, increase
my holdings and de-risk" over its 10 year incarnation but achieved very little else? AND the sp is currently
multiples down from the one time high of .049. So DB may be correct that the sp
might multiply but when it does it will initially only reach some suckers buy in price.
Now
@JackMR might be happy that he's been able to take profit which he attributes to the "DR brigade" and I know that's the name of the game; but for me it's unconscionable that you would gloat about it when you've been part of the "upramping brigade" from day dot. An brigade that imho contributed to that sp surpassing what was fair value.
Historically the management team have not delivered on promises and there are
unanswered discrepancies in their annual reports. Yet, I find hypocritical that the same people that bemoan the highlighting of historical information find it completely permissible to speculate on the potential inferences that can be taken from historical grades in Guyana.
Lastly
@JackMR the use of the word "ammo" in your last post suggests you think there is a battle going on? I can't imagine any reason someone would want to see this Company fail, including
@fooca,
@Taurus65 or any other holder - if it did they, as well as decent mum and dad investors, would loose money ... which is just nonsensical
Perhaps some holders just want transparency and are less focused on their own "gains" and more on the progression of management itself. Imo performance to-date has been questionable
in a number of areas but as the ones who are and will be driving the Company moving forward, I think their accountability
in all areas is extremely pertinent, especially to you "longs"
.
Honestly, even as a non holder, if they were to announce some positive,
binding, news I'd most likely be back (I'd perhaps have to balance some remaining trust issues against the announcement first). Time is money and I've wasted a year following this share but for me I need more than "imminent" to regain the faith. Bloody
@Taurus65 sending me on wild TH goose chases
That however does not mean that current and
future investors both positive (upramp) and negative (downramp) don't have the right to decide what information both current and historical is relevant to their investment risk profile. The mistake I made when buying into this share,
when it was on a one sided upramp run, was not looking at the historical information - my responsibility I know. But maybe now it's more clearly available on this forum to those it
may matter to and, for those it doesn't, well surely they can just ignore it (perhaps by using methods akin to those suggested by
@SusiQ above) and continue to comfortably invest in GPP.
Have we seriously become such self important snowflakes that we can't read something that is of no interest to us and feel the need to try to silence them (using multiple means
) - use the ignore button instead, please.
