DOES THE SCIENCE LOSE RELEVANCE?I would say, NOPE! Thats...

DOES THE SCIENCE LOSE RELEVANCE?

I would say, NOPE! Thats because, negative or positive findings or happenings remain relevant, even if the initiator is long gone. It is the company behind the science that is at risk of losing relevance, not the science itself!

OPT produced data that will forever be part of the body of knowledge in that field, even if OPT were to cease and die anytime soon! The same would apply to Clarity if the business failed. But the science will live on!

It helps too that the future of this science in particular, looks very bright! A conference aptly named the 'PSMA Conference' just closed in San Francisco! I can not recall ever seeing a conference named after a protein on the surface of a cancer cell!

Clarity looks to be in the right place! And indeed, Clarity turned up, chipped in, and also gave a presentation!

And, I can see another on the cancer targets that Clarity happens to be an important player in: the Gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) in Prostate Cancer! That's the Cu64-BOMBESIN target, which SABRE, COMBAT, and BOP Trials are evaluating. Around 25% of Prostate Cancers do not express PSMA, meaning that PSMA PET diagnostic and therapies like Illuccix, Pylarify, Pluvicto, or even SAR-bisPMA Cu64 and Cu67, do not work. That's the market that's Cu64-BOMBESIN (diagnostic) and Cu67-BOMBESIN (therapy) are chasing!

The science will not lose relevance!

If (in the unlikely event), Clarity do fails and crush, I suspect someone else will want to lay their hands on the science! The pipeline is very deep and broad.

https://psmaconference.ucsf.edu/2025-conference-event-details