I wonder if the Oath Keepers could sue Signal for (allegedly)...

First 33 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
thecurious1

23,007 Posts.

8

15/01/22

09:37

Post #: 58884147
Share

Originally posted by watso: ↑

Rhodes has been repeatedly linked to Stone, who should probably be very concerned right now, according to political commentator Ron Filipkowski.

“I’m sure Roger Stone doesn’t have to worry about these Oathkeepers flipping on him,” Filipkowski tweeted after the seditious conspiracy charges were announced. “Yeah, they’re facing 20 years in prison and the government is willing to negotiate with them for full cooperation, but these guys are solid. I’m sure they won’t say anything to save themselves.”
.
As for how the Oath Keepers’ plans were uncovered by the government, that should concern Stone, too, along with any other suspects involved in the January 6 plot. According to CNBC, the feds were able to gain access to encrypted Signal messages. As for how, the feds aren’t saying, but that should raise concerns for any participants who thought they were protected by using the supposedly secure platform.

https://uproxx.com/viral/oath-keepers-seditious-conspiracy-charges-roger-stone/

NOT MUCH FUN BEING A TRUMPY SUPPORTER THESE DAYS..

As trump would say :-

"We Will Have So Much losing, If I Get Elected That You May Get Bored With losing"

TRUMPIES BETTER GET USED TO LOSING

Expand

I wonder if the Oath Keepers could sue Signal for (allegedly) false advertising regarding "a secure platform" ?

They will certainly need lots of cash for their lawyers.

"Neither Signal, nor your phone company, nor the government can read your messages. "

https://www.*.com.au/signal-app?r=US&IR=T

Just curious.......

(business insider)

Last edited by thecurious1: 15/01/22
4 Upvote

Reply