So now that i'm on a roll, just imagine the following scenario, no names mentioned to protect the innocent and the guilty, and any resemblance to the living or dead are purely coincidental. For the avoidance of doubt, this is a fictitious example, but may resonate with some smarter types with synapses capable of faster connections than Australian broadband.
Independent expert opines that a largely scrip based takeover is fair and reasonable, but reserves the right to have a second crack at it and change his mind, if this view gets him badly in the poo. Never to be heard from again, the bid finally succeeds, and creates losers and bigger losers among the target's shareholders, all apparently receiving lower than the announced initial bid price .....very interesting that, a takeover, where the price goes down ! I wish real estate auctions did that, where you kept lowering the price - ust imagine how many houses you could buy for zero! The target company losers take a smaller haircut and get mostly cash and the bigger losers get a crew cut and narrowly miss a scalping.
Who would you call? Rod Sims, Wayne Byres, or Blokey McBlokebloke in Canberra, i mean after all, someone had got to be sticking up for the silent majority, haven't they? Err, it's gone very quiet out there. I think i'll focus on that Latitude IPO now, i mean, what could go wrong?
Mining Tragic
Expand