"Quite obviously you are utterly naive in law. There is not one shred of proof that Gillard ever saw the document or even touched it - just the same as Howard - and unfortunately with no proof Gillard read/saw the document these people can get away with telling lies. Different party same defence."
What document? You're on the wrong horse. I have never mentioned anything about documents or who knew or did not know, neither do I care. Mmartin asked me to pose a specific question for Julia Gillard, which I did. But there was no response to that.
Yes, I am pretty naieve in a lot of things. But you never know, do you?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- don't miss the 7.30 report tonight
"Quite obviously you are utterly naive in law. There is not one...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)