I will write it again, this time slowly for you SF so you get...

I will write it again, this time slowly for you SF so you get what I am asking...... "Does anyone know if Metgasco completed the report into what they intended to do with the waste water before they pulled up stumps in the Northern Rivers".
If Metgasco say they are coming back, then I assume they will need a water plan prior to re-commencing.

Interestingly though Metgasco has not spoken of the huge delays caused by protest, and that in itself cannot be sorted by "softer regulations" with a change in Government, the people who live in the MEL PELs will still be there. If I held shares I would be asking why as a shareholder this was not advised to me, other than one short line in a statement. It certainly would have been a factor in Metgasco packing up, yet they only cite Government regulations as a reasoning.