NTA = Net Assets Value
NTA per share = (Assets Value - Debt)/(Number of Shares)
NTA for GMG is near $1.
The problem here is not NTA, it is evident since NTA is 3 times the sp. The problems that GMG might be facing now:
1) Confidence in sector
2) Condidence on company management
3) Leverage
4) A-REIT second round of capital raising
4) Cash Flow (not dramatic)
NTA helps as an indicator, but just bear in mind that GPT has decreased their NTA about 50% on one day. If GMG did the same, that would mean NTA = 50c by next week (i'm not saying that's the case). Hence, NTA is a good indicator of value, and having sp under NTA only gives you a perception of how good price you're paying for a share, but at the same time if someone is willing to sell under the value there must be a reason. eg IIF NTA = $1.70 (as of 30-12-08) sp = 17c.
Cheers
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- dont worry be happy
NTA = Net Assets ValueNTA per share = (Assets Value -...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GMG (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$35.05 |
Change
-0.180(0.51%) |
Mkt cap ! $66.56B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$34.90 | $35.18 | $34.63 | $82.99M | 2.373M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 7904 | $35.01 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$35.06 | 1128 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 7904 | 35.010 |
1 | 28 | 35.000 |
2 | 11183 | 34.980 |
1 | 18749 | 34.960 |
1 | 7904 | 34.950 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
35.060 | 541 | 1 |
35.190 | 7904 | 1 |
35.200 | 2789 | 1 |
35.220 | 7904 | 2 |
35.230 | 750 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 30/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
GMG (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
MTL
MANTLE MINERALS LIMITED
Nick Poll, Executive Director
Nick Poll
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online