You are correct, I and I know a few others have been very scathing of xTV for allowing defective and incomplete sites into the public domain.
When I read the glossy bio's of the board members and then I saw the substandard product being published in the public domain - things did not add up from a professional, ISO or market perspective. Maybe the comments on HC did have an effect and stop some buying; but I so would the basic fundamentals of no customers, no revenue, no commercial product, no road map...
I do not apologise to HC readers for scrutinising and being critical, and hope that my observations have persuaded 1 or more investors to be cautious. For what it is worth, I have offered my assistance to Joe; but he has not contacted me.
Although I am out, I continue to watch for turning point signs; because the company has the technology; but it needs the right team who deliver and build rungs.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Don't write of xTV as a penny dreadful
You are correct, I and I know a few others have been very...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
Add NZS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.334M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
NEWS
Antler Copper Project hits major permitting milestone – air quality permit advances to final review
NZS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable