And your evidence for this alleged manipulation is what exactly,...

And your evidence for this alleged manipulation is what exactly, soj88? A 10% drop followed by a 10% rise? Sorry buddy, shares go up and down all the time, it doesn't prove anything by itself. When it rose up to 16p none of you were crying about manipulation (except after the fact, of course, based on some pretty flimsy evidence about a capital raising, whereas when the price drops it's always done in real time).

This is like those nutters who think the government is trying to mind control them by putting something in the water. When it's pointed out there's no evidence for their allegations, they say it's because the government are really good at covering it up. But whenever something slightly out of the ordinary happens they're all over it screaming about conspiracies and other nonsense. Your theories are on the same level as this. In fact I'd say they're even worse because at least the government exactly is theoretically possible. Whereas it is IMPOSSIBLE to manipulate public listed securities.

Get that? It can't be done. Anyone can place buy or sell orders onto a market and the problem with conspiracies is they only work if everyone is reading from the same page. Given anyone with access to a computer and some funds can buy or sell shares at the current market rate it is not possible for there to be any manipulation.