Tactic says "You must be pretty dumb to ask this question banjar! Ms Corby's case is totally different in that she didn't ASK for trouble, that is, if you believe as I do that the "grass" wasn't hers".
I wonder haow Tactic knows that the"grass" wasn't hers?
Does he have some 'inside' knowledge.
Is he part of the Corby's legal team?
Is he familiar with her travel history?
Has he been in attendance at her trial?
So, according to Tactic, it's I can simply decide on a persons's innocence by looking at her pretty face. It's very, very simple! Who needs a trial? Just ask Tactic, he knows best!
