Not true - up to $1.1m maybe - they couldn't fine a Mum and DAd operation $1.1m for a breach of consumer law, could they. Also is this one breach or 400ish?
Flt got a penalty of $11m plus costs for a breach with much higher costs to consumers than this one, to do with their lowest price guarantee. They may get sued by a customer if they couldn't actually do the procedure and had their eyesite damaged, but maybe unfairly, older people don't tend to get as much of a payout for damages as they are retired etc.
Anyway - we will see what happens
Not true - up to $1.1m maybe - they couldn't fine a Mum and DAd...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NHF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$6.98 |
Change
-0.140(1.97%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.385B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $7.07 | $7.07 | $6.97 | $5.715M | 816.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3938 | $6.98 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $7.00 | 49574 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NHF (ASX) Chart |