Ah see silky you are incorrect I have voiced my risk opinions as...

Ah see silky you are incorrect I have voiced my risk opinions as well on AUZ. I have even done my SWOT analysis and posted that also,

Many risks are still a possibility for that company and many junior mining companies in this field..

I work in this industry been apart of companies who went into receivership, redundancies, I know the very real risks of mining projects failing..

But what AUZ have to date and done to date to limit the risks and prove the process works from using 5th gen HPAL process flow designs, etc. I'll leave my AUZ comments for those forums,

But my negative viewpoint isn't all negative, I wish CLQ can prove their technology, I'm an avid supporter of processing philosophy changes and improvements. I just think it's a bold claim, to boast worlds lowest costs, and extremely low coatings for CAPEX and OPEX figures which dont even come close to what the true costs are.

That's all mate. Nothing biased, just as people in the AUZ forums, its purely to inform the un informed.. or ones who dont truly understand the realistics of mining projects..

Would you ask your lawyer a medical question and take his advice?

Pointing out flaws in something doesn't make it less valuable it just gives another perspective on how something isn't always perfect mate.

JD