That's not a straight answer. You are trying to shut down a reasonable discussion of AP ore processing by suggesting it's not relevant for "decades", but then you won't explain why. That's not reasonable. Therein lies the problem and the reason I'm asking for answers. All you've provided here is a regurgitation of the information which raises the question: What fraction of reserves is Lynas ready to process (CZ/LI) and what fraction represents reserves (AP) they have yet to provide a plan for?
The question is a fair one, especially given the fact that the current resource update is based on increasing LOM to 20+ or 25+ years using AP ore reserves for which the COG is in question.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)