on EG01, I would think there’s a chance of that too...

on EG01, I would think there’s a chance of that too @Mattspies.

we’ve gone from BHP geos inferring a 450m deep completely discreet anomaly to our geos first agreeing with them and then changing to a 200m deep broad spread folding type anomaly that doesn’t look much different from that generally interpreted as shales in the region.

the change in depth is not a marginal shift on EG01. Not the shift from discreet. EG02 is quite shallow at 50m and nothing seemed to change there. All that said, the most likely outcome, irrespective of depth, is shales - we are just hoping for otherwise.