Well the definition of a substantial shareholder (the correct term apparently) is a person or entity that controls 5% or more of shareholder votes clearly they didn’t have that hence no requirement for a change in substantial holder notice but there there likely would have been a change in the company’s top 20 shareholders which is something you can generally find but you have to do a bit of searching for. So I suggest you go find it yourself
Drilling Results, page-29
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 32 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MRD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.785M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | 0.1¢ | $3.086K | 3.086M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 5695000 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 219267703 | 109 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.37pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MRD (ASX) Chart |