drilling/testing, page-3

I still believe Antipa will find/define a huge deposit on their ground. Calibre isn't dead in the water, on the contrary to be honest, but the market is bad at the moment, low grade high tonnage doesn't get people excited these day's. The Matilda and Ank-H targets look promising as well.

What I find very interesting is the MMI-M soil sampling technique AZY used. I never heard of this and wanted to know more about it. I came across a document which explains in simple terms how it works. What stood out for me was the fact that this technique only measures the mobile metal ions which have to be sourced from underlying mineralisation, because when subject to lateral movement, these mobile metal ions are transformed to bound ions due to the limited life span they have and these bound ions are not measured with the MMI-M technique.

If you look at the images in the recent announcements, which shows the results of this MMI-M sampling in relation to current drilling at Calibre one can conclude that regions of strongest mineralisation haven't been touched and that mineralisation does run all the way from Calibre to Magnum. I don't have to point out what that means if this is the case.

All sounds very interesting, but this MMI-M technique first has to prove itself by showing that the higher soil readings does indeed mean higher grade mineralisation and prove that there really is mineralisation where current geophysics surveys didn't showed any potential (i.e. between Calibre and Magnum).

The upcoming drilling will tell us more about the reliability of this soil sampling technique. Maybe someone has experience with this sampling technique and is willing to share their findings?

Link to MMI-M document:
http://devoncorp.net/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/MMI_Summary.208114854.pdf