Thank you "“The FAA is still dragging its feet on its...

Thank you

"“The FAA is still dragging its feet on its congressionally mandated requirement to develop procedures for critical infrastructure locations to request airspace restriction,” Lisberg says. The agency has rulemaking underway to address that requirement, a provision of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016, but did not provide a specific timeline. "The FAA is aware of the July 2020 incident in Pennsylvania," the agency said in a statement. "The agency works closely with the Department of Homeland Security and other federal, state, local, and tribal security partners to support investigations into malicious drone activity.""

The mentioned 'Mandated' Law sounds like a lot like here and else where. A key bit is "All -Hazards" approach!

"

Positive security obligation

Those in critical sectors who are responsible for a critical infrastructure asset (whether by sector-specific definition in the Bill or prescription/declaration) may be subject to the positive security obligation. The positive security obligation involves 3 potential aspects:

1. adopting and maintaining a critical infrastructure risk management program, requiring responsible entities to manage and mitigate risks by applying an all-hazards approach;"

https://www.minterellison.com/articles/changes-to-critical-infrastructure-laws-in-2021
Happy to hold existing gains in my toe in DRO as the party is yet to really start. While it feels slow we can all see significant rapid development in Drones. We all sadly saw aircraft used as weapons in New York/US 20 years ago. The improved significantly improved security on aircraft is yet to be seen in drones. The laws requiring Companies and government agency's to be prepared for 'all hazards' is clearly a likely an accelerator + law for DRO