(Joanne Nova)This is how the paradigm changes. The old activism...

  1. 26,656 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 21

    (Joanne Nova)
    This is how the paradigm changes. The old activism is quietly dropped down the memory hole…
    Buried in a save-the-koala story on ABC News tonight is an ABC journalist saying for the first time that it is “current fire management practices” that are the problem. Rani Hayman didn’t say fuel load, but she might as well have. The reference to “indigenous fire practices” makes it obvious that the ABC means more hazard reduction burns (not that they can say so). She also didn’t say “climate change” — write it in your diary. On November 14th, the same ABC journalist was only interviewing the posterboys who blamed “climate change” for the fires.

    UPDATE: Holy smoke — the Sydney Morning Herald also appear to have flipped hours earlier in the morning and in a much stronger and more direct way. Regular SMH reader Dave B sends in the link and says “wow… here’s a huge surprise”. Finally a spot of real journalism. Was this story the last nail in the ABC fuel-load denial?

    Prescribed burning ‘key to controlling fires’.
    By Tim Barlass, Sydney Morning Herald

    Expert says blazes have burnt where hazard-reduction took place two years ago. “

    Tim Barlass, SMH: A forestry expert has condemned bushfire prevention strategies in an open letter to the Prime Minister and premiers, saying it is entirely within their power to put an end to the situation by prescribed burning. Vic Jurskis, a fellow of the Institute of Foresters of Australia, the body representing more than 1200 forestry professionals, says Australians are being told that “fires are uncontrollable in extreme weather and there’s nothing we can possibly do”. He said the “simple solution” of preventative or prescribed burns to reduce fuel levels of leaves, dead twigs and other vegetation emerged from a House of Representatives inquiry after the 2003 Canberra fires, which destroyed 488 houses.

    Mr Jurskis said: “The fires that burnt Canberra in 2003 jumped over miles and miles of bare paddocks. The problem is if you have three-dimensional, continuous fuel and extreme conditions, you can generate ember showers that travel tens of kilometres ahead of the front.

    “A fire break is going to do nothing at all. You have to manage the whole landscape.”

    “It is bogged down by green [environmental] and red tape which makes getting approval for a prescribed burn a very slow and complex process.

    “They have introduced a system that makes it virtually impossible to manage the bush in a sustainable way. I am just one of thousands of volunteers out there who are frustrated.”


    Skeptics have been mocking the ABC and Greens and Fairfax news for years:

    http://joannenova.com.au/…/skeptics-win-on-fires-abc-quie…/…


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.