dso crushing underway, page-26

It is the company's responsibility to update their JORC report. Because CDU does not do this hardly infers the JORC has serious shortcomings. It is CDU's responsibility which, history shows, they have not managed well.

CDU would hardly be 'damned' for updating their resource inventory to a highee level of confidence now they are digging the stuff up. How does that make a shred of sense? They actually now have an opportunity to prove their point by releasing numbers (in the appropriate way) but instead they refuse to do so. Let's just take time to digest that.

the JORC guideline is significantly flawed when anything unusual is encountered. Rocklands is absolutely unusual, and production will prove that the JORC guideline significantly underestimates the true content.

anyone who continues to insist that the JORC can and would include everything contained within the Rocklands site if the company 'updated' their resource does not fully understand the limitations of the JORC guidelines or the limitations of the mechanics involved in getting samples for those guidelines.