Well - if it is material, update the JORC resource, or at least come out with an additional resource
If it is not material - stop releasing multiple press releases with lots of glossy pictures, but containing no real information.
If for one would be extremely worried if I was an investor in CDU - and if CDU formed a major part of my portfolio, I would be seeking to reduce my exposure.
For a moment try to forget that this is CDU and just look at the facts - what facts - to date:
> No (limited) material disclosure > Fails to meet previously announced deadlines > Funding requirements are opaque
And when questioned - the defence is usually the same - represents a 'unique' situation - so doesn't have to conform to the standards applied to its peers.
For the LT CDU investors, I really hope you are right, but all the signs say otherwise.
From my perspective:
> Definitely some DSO present (it would be good to know tonnages, production forecasts) - but not as much as a lot of investors are assuming > Primary sulphide orebody - nice and high grade, but I would be thinking of going down the low tonnage/high grade route, rather than the bulk mining approach (small open pit, then UG) > Forget the standalone magnetite (of doubtful economics) and also discount the cobalt.
But at the moment, what I cannot get my head around is:
If there is as much DSO as CDU seem to imply (but note they never actually say), why are they not monetising this to fund the project completion - rather than trying to cobble together a debt/equity raise?
CDU Price at posting:
$1.84 Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held