Shadow, the measured and detailed response is very...

Shadow, the measured and detailed response is very appreciated

The average patent application timeline is 12-32 months. In this case it took about 48 months to approve. So I assume the complexity of it was a large reason.

From Gerberlaw:
After filing, your application will be assigned to a patent examiner within the USPTO. The length of the examiner's queue, the complexity of your invention, and the type of application you have filed will determine your wait length.

What I would be curious to know and don’t have the expertise to answer, is whether or not the processes used in LLMs to disseminate the data are same as those described on this patent. Because if they are not then yeah its value is questionable. Because we can all agree LLMs are superior.

However if the technical processes described in this patent are the same as those used in LLMs and the patent is based purely around its use displaying, compressing or indexing information from a meeting, then it’s very difficult to value.

Any techies out there can help out?