dubious ifca deal

Optimix, your stupidity knows no bounds.

Quoting my post: “The court case revealed CMQ mastery in producing the dubious Inviro contract that was announced as unconditional, not finaced by CMQ and achieved the price. And it was revealed the contract was hatched to satisfy the sale covenant and the sale price was hidden behind the scam of giving away free products”.

Quoting Optimix almost immediate response-:
“The connection between the Inviro contract and IFCA is precisely zero. A silly example of totally false logic.
WILLIAMS DID NOT PUT THE INVIRO CONTRACT TOGETHER; HE WAS NOT IN CHEMEQ AT THE TIME. Nor did he have anything to do with drafting the IFCA contract apart from accepting it”.

The connection was in the condition precedent where “CMQ is not aware of any misleading or deceptive announcement made to the ASX or the public”. Any fool can read from the court case that the Inviro announcement is misleading, deceptive and wrong. So why did the IFCA deal contain this condition precedent when the court case clearly showed the Inviro sale was not as announced?

In addition, it shows DW’s tenor in CMQ at the time the Inviro contract was hatched – is it the same skill at work in the dubious IFCA deal?

Cheers