Not for nothing Scott, but Peter Dutton didn't need to spruik No to 'bolster' his far right support.
I know you are looking at stuff with your blinkers on Scott, but if the Prime Minister is able to run a national campaign for Yes, then all other members of the Parliament can run national campaigns for their particular choice too. You can call them political if you like (because they are), or you can call them apolitical if it grates less on you. But you can't say that one is political and one isn't. I don't believe you actually see it that way, you shouldn't create two sets of rules to suit your argument, it detracts from everything else you say.
