He was wrong. By your own link, he claimed it wasn’t a safe seat, despite all historical data suggesting it was. And low and behold it was a safe seat, and it was retained within margin.
You’re failing miserably here because you know you’re attempting to use a specious argument on a far small subset of data against a macro historical data set. You’re wrong, deal with it, move on. Stop crowing early
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dunkley byelection
He was wrong. By your own link, he claimed it wasn’t a safe...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)