accept facts? lol you’re the one arguing that 6.3% wasn’t a safe seat, despite it being retained as predicted for a safe seat. And you’re arguing that the average swing against a sitting government of -4% isn’t right, despite the result from the Dunkley by election nearly being bang on the anti-government historical result.
Youve twisted yourself into such a state you’re arguing against the actual result because it doesn’t support your irrelevant specious argument
Talk about poor character. You can’t even admit when you’re wrong despite the number right in front of you telling you, you are.
