lol.
l'm still waiting for you to explain your " renewables backing nuclear during peaks " claim .
lt's the opposite of what the Dud announced.
Why would they build renewable to back nuclear during peaks ? Why wouldn't they just have more nuclear ?
" New data out of the US has confirmed that large-scale wind and solar are significantly cheaper sources of electricity generation than coal and gas – and even undercut fossil fuels on price with the addition of energy storage, in some cases. "
So renewables are cheaper than existing coal in many cases. How are you going to shut down an old coal plant that can't compete with renewables and spend a whole lot of money adapting to nuclear and be cheaper ??
Warning . Troll smashing in progress .
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dutton’s plan to nuke Australia’s renewable energy transition explained in full
lol.l'm still waiting for you to explain your " renewables...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online