IF they lied when providing their information their Citizenship may be cancelled.
I really can't understand why some on here want to protect someone who has clearly breached and found guilty of an intended criminal act that may have killed many of true Australians citizens.
Benbrika, sentenced in 2009 to 15 years in prison for terrorism for plotting attacks on several iconic places in Australia, was the first individual to have his citizenship revoked onshore in the country.
A former extremist cleric, Benbrika, preached to his followers that it was justified to kill women and children during “jihad” or holy war.He was arrested in 2005, along with 16 others, for planning to carry out several attacks on a rugby match and a nuclear reactor.
Australia has passed a series of anti-Islamic terrorism laws since 2014, including one that allows revoking the citizenship of dual-nationals who traveled to the Middle East to fight with the Islamic State.
So tell me, does this person deserve to retain one half of his citizenship with a profile like that.
Others have had their citizenship cancelled offshore and not allowed to return and rightly so, but because this was done onshore to the benefits of all Australians now people want to point the finger at someone, really some need to think of this county first and your family safety when it comes to scum like this.
