I doubt if he's unhinged (because of this) - I think he's probably just trying some political point scoring in an attempt to pinch some extremes from the total idiot parties for his already dead horse party
you can see by the responders on here that he's hit the idiot button nicely
But, more importantly IMO - I think his main target is Wong - and, I think the he's most likely wrong --
I think Wong has been all over this pretty much right through and she's certainly all over Dutto -
this is what Dutto said about Wong and the speak about hinting of recognising Palestine
"It is the most reckless act of a foreign minister I have seen in my 22 years in the parliament, and it has weakened our international reputation and standing."
Well - one would want to know Wong's motives, what her reasoning is for saying what she said - she doesn't say much that isn't planned in detail -
and right from the get go, Wong has got this - all she said of the attack initially was - to Israel 'show restraint' -
she was light years in front of most nations - and, I suggest that she's near the lead again in this
So, to me - Dutto is only using the Port Arthur/Opera house social shift comparison for a purpose - to have a crack at Wong
What Wong is really up to - we won't know for a little while ----------- Dutto will follow along in due course - at least months - maybe even a few years
tis the way of the dead horse party and Dutto ---------- it's taken them from 1998 until now to go all gung ho on nuclear ---------- that's about 26 years -
so, maybe expect the same from Dutto to wake up to what should be done about the ME
