Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

so your saying the laws were tested for 22 years and then having...

First 54 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kingy

4,391 Posts.

221

11/05/24

14:18

Post #: 73777666
Share

Originally posted by Cowboyinvestor: ↑

hahaha you havent read the article.... you cant make up this kind of stupid... you're jumping at shadows from a headline of an article you havent read.

here's the facts for you 22 years no successful high court challenges... 18months of labor 2 new high court justices appointed, a new chief justice appointed (the former solicitor general under Rudd/Gillard) and suddenly criminals are being released on the streets to violently attack elderly people. Even worse, the governments had 6 months to instigate new legislation or protection orders to take these criminals off the street.... and what have they done? Taken the ankle bracelets off and left them to harm the community... not even Shorten could defend this incompetence, yet here you are, lying about reading an article, swimming in your own feces

Expand

so your saying the laws were tested for 22 years and then having been tested for 22 yrs the labor appointments apparently decided the laws were illegal. Wow thats a big call...have you got the details of a previous failed case and the ruling...was it on the same laws which were found to be illegal?
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...

First 54 Last