I'll just pick one..... Liddell.
AGL owns Liddell and they have distinctly other plans than a nuke power plant.
how is this supposed to work out? are they going to nationalise AGL so they can take the site(s)?
theres also a reliance on dam water for Liddell. wouldn't it be more suitable to take over Origin's Eraring site where it accesses ocean lake water (unlimited)?
no costings worked out either. yet Dutton had cried out for costings from Albanese from everything down to printer paper (see McKenzie's FOI requests).
is this clearly thought through? discussed in cabinet (Insiders reported no cabinet consultation)? actually planned with real numbers?
it looks poorly considered if they have no costings and a very short, seeming improbable time frame when their only infrastructure project, Snowy 2.0, has a cost blow out to triple the original costings and at least double the timeframe for completion.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Dutton's folly
Dutton's folly
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 110 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online