Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Dutton's folly, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kingy

8,829 Posts.

221

19/06/24

13:26

Post #: 74389816
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

I'll just pick one..... Liddell.

AGL owns Liddell and they have distinctly other plans than a nuke power plant.

how is this supposed to work out? are they going to nationalise AGL so they can take the site(s)?

theres also a reliance on dam water for Liddell. wouldn't it be more suitable to take over Origin's Eraring site where it accesses ocean lake water (unlimited)?

no costings worked out either. yet Dutton had cried out for costings from Albanese from everything down to printer paper (see McKenzie's FOI requests).

is this clearly thought through? discussed in cabinet (Insiders reported no cabinet consultation)? actually planned with real numbers?

it looks poorly considered if they have no costings and a very short, seeming improbable time frame when their only infrastructure project, Snowy 2.0, has a cost blow out to triple the original costings and at least double the timeframe for completion.

Expand

He announced nuclear and certainly Littleproud and barnaby knew nothing about it...and he announced getting rid of the 2030 targets and it seems noone knew anything about it....must be the republican advisors feeding him.
8 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

TRS

Don't cry that it's over: The Reject Shop shares to disappear on Wednesday

AII

Almonty Industries shares EXPLODE! Rheinmetall, Renk, and Hensoldt left in the shadows!

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 015 – Yeah, we're thinking the IPO market is back

ENR

Encounter's Aileron recon success 'illustrates how much more still to be found'

Tuesday's HotCopper trends: Paradigm funding, Nanoveu drone gains | July 1

First 2 Last

SPONSORED BY