Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Dutton's folly, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kingy

9,192 Posts.

221

19/06/24

13:26

Post #: 74389816
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

I'll just pick one..... Liddell.

AGL owns Liddell and they have distinctly other plans than a nuke power plant.

how is this supposed to work out? are they going to nationalise AGL so they can take the site(s)?

theres also a reliance on dam water for Liddell. wouldn't it be more suitable to take over Origin's Eraring site where it accesses ocean lake water (unlimited)?

no costings worked out either. yet Dutton had cried out for costings from Albanese from everything down to printer paper (see McKenzie's FOI requests).

is this clearly thought through? discussed in cabinet (Insiders reported no cabinet consultation)? actually planned with real numbers?

it looks poorly considered if they have no costings and a very short, seeming improbable time frame when their only infrastructure project, Snowy 2.0, has a cost blow out to triple the original costings and at least double the timeframe for completion.

Expand

He announced nuclear and certainly Littleproud and barnaby knew nothing about it...and he announced getting rid of the 2030 targets and it seems noone knew anything about it....must be the republican advisors feeding him.
8 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Japan tariff deal inked at 15% – as long as US gets half a trillion of investment

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

TLX

Telix sinks as US regulator SEC issues subpoena over claims

TMG

Trigg brings famed Finnish metals refiner – and its tech – onboard to bolster antimony processing

ASX Market Close: Iron awe keeps the XJO tracking along

First 2 Last