Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Yes they are going to nationalise it. That's what they do.

First 50 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
redzanti

1,081 Posts.

19/06/24

18:44

Post #: 74397033
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

I'll just pick one..... Liddell.

AGL owns Liddell and they have distinctly other plans than a nuke power plant.

how is this supposed to work out? are they going to nationalise AGL so they can take the site(s)?

theres also a reliance on dam water for Liddell. wouldn't it be more suitable to take over Origin's Eraring site where it accesses ocean lake water (unlimited)?

no costings worked out either. yet Dutton had cried out for costings from Albanese from everything down to printer paper (see McKenzie's FOI requests).

is this clearly thought through? discussed in cabinet (Insiders reported no cabinet consultation)? actually planned with real numbers?

it looks poorly considered if they have no costings and a very short, seeming improbable time frame when their only infrastructure project, Snowy 2.0, has a cost blow out to triple the original costings and at least double the timeframe for completion.

Expand

Yes they are going to nationalise it.

That's what they do.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

GYG

Guzman Y Gomez shot up nearly 40% in first hour of trades. Can it last?

Your questions From the Floor: Investment experts respond...

ASX Market Update: Shares fall flat as GYG soars on debut | 20 June, 2024

TM1

Shares up 196% on Terra's news of major reef discovery at Dante

BRX

Belararox delineates another porphyry in Argentina at Tambo South

There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...

First 50 Last

SPONSORED BY