DVP Technical Analysis, page-2026

My argument makes no sense because you say so?
Your reply telling me to leave and that I struggle with civility, emotional etc?
Is that not the pure definition of hypocrisy ?
You have no argument, instead you attack.

How about putting up a decent argument that strikes down the fact that most stocks on the ASX and the world over are manipulated by shorts?
The main thing in favour of my point is the very fact that net short positions held are not published until 4 trading days after the fact.
Why is that?

Anyone can look at short held positions (albeit 4 days late) on plenty of stocks and many are way higher shorted than DVP. Your point was to say that the short held position of DVP specifically is a factor of no buyers around to counter the shorts. How do you know this to be true for just DVP and not all other stocks shorted way more than DVP.

Argue your point without putting me down like you just did, uncivil like please.