DW8 Growth, page-14398

I think they really are looking for an answer from you.

You didn't come across like the usual bottom feeders we cop, but largely I think we as a forum want substantiation of all these views that have apparently been reasearched and considered.

It's super easy to be negative on a stock here... I'd be shocked if any of the usual trolls actually read the company releases. They don't need to - just say they have, say it's doomed to insolvency, and if questioned send the asker off an a wild goose chase of "read the announcements" or " I've posted it before". There is a reason peer reviewed research needs pinpoint references.

Ultimately right or wrong, posters like @OllieTwist @LiddleK3VIN @steve10 post their views and opinions and substantiate and generally equivocate - like you should.

We get so much black and white "business is doomed, believe me I've looked at it".

Then when asked to substantiate, it is "I'm not doing your research for you".

Obviously raises at least 3 questions (the "you" is general, not directed to you specifially:

1. Have you actually done the research?
2. Why won't you post you breakdowns and direct us to the company materials you have relied on if you have?
3. If you won't do that, what benefit is there really in a few lines about how you've figured it out, but not telling anyone.

That's the gist of the request, and I think @vacre legit wants to hear your answers.

So basically without being willing to substantiate your thoughts, the thought is kind of pointless.