Dynamic population shift, page-47

  1. 35,472 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2863
    No, because you stated the obvious by making the quote, and trying to say somehow a "rule" was inaccurate.
    The rule is fixed Duck, of course it is!

    Look at the Numbers from your own little quote on USA pop growth.
    I'm not "assuming" 1.66% ...but it still only took USA 62 years (even being inaccurate eek.png)

    ASB mid point is series B, ie: 1.1%

    My point is Australia population can double in 70 years very easily,,as easy as just 1% pa - my original point

    got it??
    Last edited by Sector: 17/10/19
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.