No, because you stated the obvious by making the quote, and trying to say somehow a "rule" was inaccurate.
The rule is fixed Duck, of course it is!
Look at the Numbers from your own little quote on USA pop growth.
I'm not "assuming" 1.66% ...but it still only took USA 62 years (even being inaccurate )
ASB mid point is series B, ie: 1.1%
My point is Australia population can double in 70 years very easily,,as easy as just 1% pa - my original point
got it??
- Forums
- Property
- Dynamic population shift
No, because you stated the obvious by making the quote, and...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online