Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Sorry Nev. I forgot to tag you in response above.

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jopo

15,757 Posts.

21/02/25

19:35

Post #: 77972105
Share

Originally posted by NevBhc: ↑

There are many flaws above, which could be debated forever.

In summary:
You can't just ignore the 342 W/m^2 radiate transfer because it devastates your claim, hand waving doesn't impress.
Especially without offering a mathematically balanced alternative that aligns with physical reality.

Conclusion
The magnitudes of IR reaching the surface, incoming from the Sun and emitted to space are all now measured with good precision along with the spectrum of each. You'll need to account for all of these and present the mathematics to convincingly refute 150 years of science before you publish and receive your Nobel for your new theory of atmospheric physics.
When do you plan to publish this ?

Expand

Sorry Nev. I forgot to tag you in response above.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Zip's stunning comeback: Is this the start of a $14 revival?

CUV

Clinuvel shares dip, even as CEO comes back from temp leave

MEG

Iberian expansion: Megado turns to Europe with Spanish copper mines

AVM

'Sure to be busy': Advance's Yuquivo drilling gets off to top start with first-hole hits

HotCopper Highlights, Week 24: Israel boosts Energy; Meeka eyes production & Mag7 back

Week 24 Wrap: WW3 looms (again); US econ data tepid & silver surfing

Gold, Brent Crude spike as Israel strikes Iran in worst-case scenario

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 013 - They changed the IPO rules (and that's a good thing)

RML

Resolution's dual-listing to 'expedite growth' – and sets stage for NASDAQ foray

ASX

ASX Ltd notches upward on sale of company meant to fix CHESS 3 years ago

First 5 Last