I couldn't open all the links but from what I saw so far this...

I couldn't open all the links but from what I saw so far this tenement was cancelled due to overlap with other tenements and LRS is disputing the decision.

The key is in the last paragraph - all the body of the letter refers to the legislation and reasons why we believe we should own this tenement.

"In this context, it is argued for the reconsideration of Dispatch No.
171090/CAREAS-MG/ANM/2022, so that the Applicant is granted the
research authorization covering only the remaining area,
avoiding conflict or overlap, pursuant to art. 18, § 2, of the Code
of Mining, expressly requesting that the area of the
requirement to avoid conflict or overlap with license no.
830,833/2001."

https://sei.anm.gov.br/sei/modulos/pesquisa/md_pesq_documento_consulta_externa.php?iPKNOI4i-Tt3bdeqzGJgGCgYH-B6kWAvCl8aH0kRl60bxD20ULJ6bjQxWal04rE5bnOMc8d6vSPQSeoH_z9bn-6hQ_GV_kiXxjBJghlwkCknDqKRN2VuzDFvQNiTj5mO

I translated this with google but is clear enough - rather than cancel this tenement we are asking to reduce it in a way to do not overlap with the east tenement (830833/2001 - José Silva Lapa).

LRS is really trying to squeeze every single cm of land to the east...