Thats a $trawman argument
I dont dissagree with science ,what i disagree with,is that people paint their faith in a belief system,and call it science
Big bang,evolution ,origins of life like the slime pit theory etc etc are beliefs
Not science
It takes faith to believe these theories are true
They are not demonstratable,recreatable,observable
The above is science
For example
Darwinian evolution says given enough time,one species or kind will eventually become something totally different kind or species
Darwin observed the variation within finches
The variations he observed were within that species or kind
No one debates this as science,observable,testable,recreatable
Belief,is when you believe,given enough time,the variations within this finch population,would become something completely different
Not observable testable,recreatable
This is belief,this is what some believe happens,this is not science
Same can be said for the slime pit theory of origins of life,big bang etc
Believe whatever you like,thats up to the individual
But dont condescend and say only theists have fath,like watsos initial post said,because its obvious faith is on both sides of the debate
This is the issue
Expand
