Why do you keep referring to SYR as a comparative Market Capitalisation; Out of millions of different aspects to both companies, only two are the same. It's like stating McDonalds and Hungry Jacks should be valued the same because they both deal with burgers, and are fast food restaurants. There is a LOT that SYR have, and a LOT that TON have which the other does not. This is the reason the two are valued differently.
