Yeah it's one of those things which I'm sure EPM will be able to get out to the public that WE aren't affected, and more just to clarify that IA is against U, not mining. The market is just not quite aware of what the election really means for other mines, since GGG is the largest and most public.
I think this YT clip gives are decent overview and summary of what's going on over there. I will say I wasn't quite aware of the political situation that caused the snap election, and the fact there's quite a bit of controversy of a new Nuuk Airport. **Note that IA is against the K mine DUE TO Uranium** not mining in general. It also highlights the independence for Greenland. With the Arctic opening up there is a potential new shipping route which will potentially draw new internation attention (particually from US and Russia's navy) now whilst this is a HC thread and not a Geopolitical commentary thread --> The potential coalition that IA will form is with the Naleraq party which is a pro independence party, Which is wanting more independence from Denmark. It begs the question how will they be able to increase the quality of living and wealth of the country?
Big note to take away from the video which clearly states "IA Acknowledges that mining offers a path towards independence" and Even open to Oil exploration. Even talks about the Chinese and US influence and investments.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)