ecp passed, page-5

"...if ECP takeover was so bad, why was it approved?"


i think the answer to this is simple....the takeover was always a good thing for those shareholders with a short term investment view ( ie less than 6 months)

So basically there were more votes coming from ppl with short term view than longer term view (2+ years)

It is unfortunate that so many investors and money market managers have such a short term view these days, but unfortunately this is the culture that we now have these days i guess!

(certain quick term small gain vs less certain long term bigger gain)

Am I making sense?

i guess i am just a little disappointed that my own choice has been ultimately overidden by someone else.

So be it!

Cheers!